Criterion II pertains to the efforts of an institution to serve students of different backgrounds and abilities, through effective teaching-learning experiences. Interactive instructional techniques that engage students in higher order ‘thinking’ and investigation, through the use of interviews, focused group discussions, debates, projects, presentations, experiments, practicum, internship and application of ICT resources are important considerations. It also probes into the adequacy, competence as well as the continuous professional development of the faculty who handle the programmes of study. The efficiency of the techniques used to continuously evaluate the performance of teachers and students is also a major concern of this Criterion.

Key Indicators:

2.1 Student Enrolment and Percentage
2.2 Student Teacher Ratio
2.3 Teaching Learning Process
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey

SSR Supporting Files

2.1.1 Enrolment Percentage View
2.1.2 Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories View
2.3.1 Student-centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative & Problem-Solving Methods View
2.4.1 Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts View
2.4.2 Percentage of full-time teachers with NET, SET, SLET, Ph.D. View
2.5.1 Mechanism of internal/external assessment grievance redressal system View
2.6.1 Programme Outcomes and Course Outcomes for Programmes offered by the institution View
2.6.2 Attainment of POs and Cos are evaluated View
2.6.3 Pass percentage of Students during the last five years (excluding backlog students) View
2.7.1 Student Satisfaction Survey View